<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing</link>
	<description>You Are Probably Wrong. Prove Otherwise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:39:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How TED (the conference) Forced Me to Change My Job</title>
		<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/comment-page-1#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>How TED (the conference) Forced Me to Change My Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testdrivenmarketing.com/?p=144#comment-343</guid>
		<description>[...] At home, I watched TED videos more often then movies or TV shows and was often compelled to blog about them. I met person after person who grudgingly watched a TED conference and was amazed at how good and addictive they were. I guess they were expecting something like high school or television documentaries (the signal to noise ratio of television documentaries is usually abysmal, probably due to their seeking to reach everyone- much like most generic enterprise marketing). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At home, I watched TED videos more often then movies or TV shows and was often compelled to blog about them. I met person after person who grudgingly watched a TED conference and was amazed at how good and addictive they were. I guess they were expecting something like high school or television documentaries (the signal to noise ratio of television documentaries is usually abysmal, probably due to their seeking to reach everyone- much like most generic enterprise marketing). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test-Driven Marketing is in the October Pragmatic Marketing Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/comment-page-1#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Test-Driven Marketing is in the October Pragmatic Marketing Newsletter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testdrivenmarketing.com/?p=144#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] ﻿Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ﻿Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Van Weerdenburg</title>
		<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Van Weerdenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testdrivenmarketing.com/?p=144#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Tough question...here are my thoughts....

Make the discussion about data, and look for small wins to move to a more data-driven (errr... test-driven) culture.

1. Force validation of the value prop by doing buyer personas through win/loss analysis and surveys. Win/loss can be done relatively quickly, and if you have that data, that makes you the expert.
2. Look hard at previous sales patterns. There is usually a lot of data there that isn&#039;t being seen- close rates, stall points, performance across different segments. I&#039;ve found some crazy stuff just looking at history that allowed rapid change without much extra effort.
3. Get good-enough analytics tools in place for measuring message response on both the website and from email.
4. Get a commitment to a more fluid web presence to allow better testing of content.
5. Make sure you can do split runs of emails to test messages.

On the generic message aspect, print out web pages and highlight the common language. Most people get it when they see that.

Finally, picking your enemies and comparison points helps. Look for growth prospects of similar companies- we are often more honest when looking at other companies. Then do some market footprint layout to emphasis positioning and blue ocean opportunities that allow leapfrogs in mindshare and greater attention from press. &quot;We need to do marketing that enables P.R.&quot; often gets attention since that is powerful indirect lead generation and 3rd party validation of value. There is a lot of great visual imagery here- marketing messaging as &quot;mindshare missiles&quot; comes to mind. Hey- there is a good blog post title: &quot;Building the Mindshare Missile&quot;.

So in summary- tie to real buyers, find incremental improvements in analytics to test concepts, and emphasize the importance of P.R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough question&#8230;here are my thoughts&#8230;.</p>
<p>Make the discussion about data, and look for small wins to move to a more data-driven (errr&#8230; test-driven) culture.</p>
<p>1. Force validation of the value prop by doing buyer personas through win/loss analysis and surveys. Win/loss can be done relatively quickly, and if you have that data, that makes you the expert.<br />
2. Look hard at previous sales patterns. There is usually a lot of data there that isn&#8217;t being seen- close rates, stall points, performance across different segments. I&#8217;ve found some crazy stuff just looking at history that allowed rapid change without much extra effort.<br />
3. Get good-enough analytics tools in place for measuring message response on both the website and from email.<br />
4. Get a commitment to a more fluid web presence to allow better testing of content.<br />
5. Make sure you can do split runs of emails to test messages.</p>
<p>On the generic message aspect, print out web pages and highlight the common language. Most people get it when they see that.</p>
<p>Finally, picking your enemies and comparison points helps. Look for growth prospects of similar companies- we are often more honest when looking at other companies. Then do some market footprint layout to emphasis positioning and blue ocean opportunities that allow leapfrogs in mindshare and greater attention from press. &#8220;We need to do marketing that enables P.R.&#8221; often gets attention since that is powerful indirect lead generation and 3rd party validation of value. There is a lot of great visual imagery here- marketing messaging as &#8220;mindshare missiles&#8221; comes to mind. Hey- there is a good blog post title: &#8220;Building the Mindshare Missile&#8221;.</p>
<p>So in summary- tie to real buyers, find incremental improvements in analytics to test concepts, and emphasize the importance of P.R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing! &#124; Test Driven Marketing -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing! &#124; Test Driven Marketing -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testdrivenmarketing.com/?p=144#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim Johnson. Tim Johnson said: If it were only that easy!! Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing! &#124; Test Driven Marketing http://bit.ly/a81prA #prodmktg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim Johnson. Tim Johnson said: If it were only that easy!! Please Stop Generic Enterprise Marketing! | Test Driven Marketing <a href="http://bit.ly/a81prA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a81prA</a> #prodmktg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Johnson</title>
		<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testdrivenmarketing.com/?p=144#comment-29</guid>
		<description>(No relation to Steve but I play one on TV)

All sound, good advice.  Have you ever run into a situation where you want to do this and are met with, &quot;We don&#039;t have time for this analysis paralysis.  We know what the value prop is.  Just send out an email so we can start generating leads.&quot;?  And if so, how did you counter the argument?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(No relation to Steve but I play one on TV)</p>
<p>All sound, good advice.  Have you ever run into a situation where you want to do this and are met with, &#8220;We don&#8217;t have time for this analysis paralysis.  We know what the value prop is.  Just send out an email so we can start generating leads.&#8221;?  And if so, how did you counter the argument?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Van Weerdenburg</title>
		<link>http://testdrivenmarketing.com/144/please-stop-generic-enterprise-marketing/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Van Weerdenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testdrivenmarketing.com/?p=144#comment-28</guid>
		<description>A nice comment from Steve Johnson of Pragmatic Marketing:

http://bit.ly/9BLVao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice comment from Steve Johnson of Pragmatic Marketing:</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/9BLVao" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9BLVao</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

